Thompson v. State

36 S.W.2d 1024, 117 Tex. Crim. 315, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 399
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 Tex. Crim. 437
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 25, 1931·No. No. 13912.·Published

Opinions

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Lloyd Ellingwood is named as the purchaser. He testified that he purchased a pint of whisky from the appellant and paid him for it; that' the transaction took place on the 5th day of April, 1930. Another witness testified to substantially the same effect.

By witnesses introduced the appellant set up the defense of alibi.

We find no bills of exception; nor does the record present for review any matter other than the sufficiency of the evidence. The conflict in the evidence was settled by the verdict of the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 36 S.W.2d 1024, 117 Tex. Crim. 315, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 399 (Tex. 1931).

36 S.W.2d 1024 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.