Thompson v. State

15 Tex. Ct. App. 168, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 94
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Tex. Ct. App. 141
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 28, 1883·No. No. 1560·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION POR RE-HEARING.

Willson, Judge.

In affirming the judgment in this case, on a former day of the term, a fatal defect in the information was overlooked. The information concludes “ against the peace and dignity of State,” instead of “against the peace and dignity of the State.” In Wallace Thompson v. The State, decided by this court at its present term (ante, p. 39), a precisely similar information was held to be bad. We therefore grant the motion for re-hearing; and, because the information is substantially and fatally defective, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 15 Tex. Ct. App. 168, 1883 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 94 (Tex. Ct. App. 1883).

15 Tex. Ct. App. 168 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.