Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Thompson v. State

DecidedNovember 7, 2005

Docket2005-MO-056

StatusUnpublished

This text of Thompson v. State (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, (S.C. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court

David Thompson, Respondent,

v.

State of South Carolina, Petitioner.

Appeal From York County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Memorandum Opinion No. 2005-MO-056
Submitted October 19, 2005 - Filed November 7, 2005

AFFIRMED

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Julie M. Thames, all of Columbia, for petitioner.

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of the Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authorities: McCray v. State, 317 S.C. 557, 455 S.E.2d 686 (1995) (this Court must affirm the rulings of the PCR court if there is any evidence to support the decision).

AFFIRMED.

TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT and PLEICONES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI