Thompson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Thompson v. State

1926 OK CR 298, 247 P. 1118, 35 Okla. Crim. 56, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 284

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 27, 1926

DocketNo. A-6026.

StatusPublished

This text of 1926 OK CR 298 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, 1926 OK CR 298, 247 P. 1118, 35 Okla. Crim. 56, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 284 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Edna Thompson, was convicted on a charge of selling one-half pint of whisky to one John Hughes, and in accordance with the verdict she was sentenced to confinement in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50 and the costs, taxed at $29.95. From the judgment an appeal was taken, by filing in this court January 12,. 1926, a petition in error with case-made. The suggestion of the *57 death of the plaintiff in error, with motion to abate, has been filed by counsel of record. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the proceedings in the above-entitled cause, and especially under the judgment therein rendered, have abated, and the county court of McIntosh county enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Edna Thompson, was convicted on a charge of selling one-half pint of whisky to one John Hughes, and in accordance with the verdict she was sentenced to confinement in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50 and the costs, taxed at $29.95. From the judgment an appeal was taken, by filing in this court January 12,. 1926, a petition in error with case-made. The suggestion of the *57 death of the plaintiff in error, with motion to abate, has been filed by counsel of record. It is therefore considered and adjudged that the proceedings in the above-entitled cause, and especially under the judgment therein rendered, have abated, and the county court of McIntosh county enter its appropriate order to that effect.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK CR 298, 247 P. 1118, 35 Okla. Crim. 56, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-oklacrimapp-1926.