Thompson v. State
Opinion
Filed 3/30/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2017 ND 63
Ronald Scott Thompson, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20160320
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Sonna M. Anderson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Charles A. Stock, P.O. Box 605, Crookston, Minn. 56716-0605, for plaintiff and appellant.
Brian L. Johnson, Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellee.
Thompson v. State
No. 20160320
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Ronald Thompson appeals from an order entered on remand denying his application for post-conviction relief. After our remand in Thompson v. State , 2016 ND 101, 879 N.W.2d 93, the district court made findings and denied Thompson’s post-conviction relief application claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Thompson argues the district court erred in finding no reasonable probability existed that he would have insisted on proceeding to trial but for the controversy over the DNA test results. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2017 ND 63 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.