Thompson v. State

161 S.E. 368, 44 Ga. App. 309, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 693
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 11, 1931·No. 21831·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. In grounds of the motion for a new trial 1 to 7 inclusive there is nothing that requires the grant of a new trial.

2. The evidence amply authorized the verdict, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., eoncur. F. Joe Turner Jr., for plaintiff in error. John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, J. W. LeCraw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 161 S.E. 368, 44 Ga. App. 309, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 693 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

161 S.E. 368 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.