Thompson v. State
This text of 9 Ga. 210 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
Two grounds of error are assigned to the judgment of the Court below in this case.
We are of the opinion there was no error in the judgment of the Court below in refusing to quash the indictment. The entry on the tninütéb of the Court on the same day that a true bill [211]*211was found by the Grand Jury against the defendant, that one of the Grand Jurors, who had been sworn, was excused for the balance of the term, did not furnish even presumptive evidence against the presence of the Grand Juror at the time the bill was found by the body of which he was a member; especially when the name of the Juror was inserted in the bill of indictment. Although excused, it was the privilege of the Juror to avail himself of it, or not, as he might think proper. We will not control the discretion of the Court below in refusing to grant the continuance of the cause.
Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Ga. 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-ga-1850.