Thompson v. State
Opinion
Jeffrey Thompson appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of oxycodone following a guilty plea, arguing that the trial court erred by accepting his plea without first inquiring about a possible complete defense Thompson raised during the plea hearing. But because the record does not reflect that Thompson filed any motion to withdraw his plea, this claim is unpreserved for appeal. See Jones v. State, 708 So.2d 337, 338 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). Our affirmance is without prejudice to any right Thompson may have to address the issue via a timely filed motion for postconviction relief.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
141 So. 3d 1277 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.