Thompson v. State

25 So. 3d 646, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2010 WL 22692
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 965 So. 2d 1250
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 6, 2010·No. No. 4D08-2601·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Thane Thompson, appeals his convictions and sentence for home invasion robbery (count I) and grand theft (count II). Without discussion, we affirm Thompson’s convictions. However, it appears that Thompson’s sentence for home invasion robbery was improperly calculated on the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet as a level 10 offense — not the appropriate level 8 offense. Although not preserved for direct appeal, Thompson is free to raise this issue by way of a motion in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

HAZOURI, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 25 So. 3d 646, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2010 WL 22692 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

25 So. 3d 646 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.