Thompson v. State

25 So. 3d 646, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2010 WL 22692
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 6, 2010
DocketNo. 4D08-2601
StatusPublished

This text of 25 So. 3d 646 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. State, 25 So. 3d 646, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2010 WL 22692 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Thane Thompson, appeals his convictions and sentence for home invasion robbery (count I) and grand theft (count II). Without discussion, we affirm Thompson’s convictions. However, it appears that Thompson’s sentence for home invasion robbery was improperly calculated on the Criminal Punishment Code scoresheet as a level 10 offense — not the appropriate level 8 offense. Although not preserved for direct appeal, Thompson is free to raise this issue by way of a motion in the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

Affirmed.

HAZOURI, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 So. 3d 646, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 18, 2010 WL 22692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.