Thompson v. State

674 So. 2d 766, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3979, 1996 WL 180075
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 638 So. 2d 116
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 17, 1996·No. No. 95-01158·Published

Opinion

THREADGILL, Chief Judge.

John L. Thompson entered a plea of no contest to theft of an automobile,1 reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motions to suppress. He also challenges certain conditions of probation and court costs. We strike the court costs, but otherwise affirm the judgment and sentence.

We strike the $288 in court costs because they were imposed without reference to statutory authority. If they represent discretionary costs they must be individually announced to alert the defendant to their legal basis and dollar amount. Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). These costs are stricken without prejudice to the state to seek to have them reimposed. Id. at 114.

Affirmed; improper court costs stricken.

SCHOONOVER and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 674 So. 2d 766, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 3979, 1996 WL 180075 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

674 So. 2d 766 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reyes v. State
655 So. 2d 111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)