Thompson v. State
643 So. 2d 110, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9618, 1994 WL 543102
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 7, 1994·No. No. 94-02835·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court’s order granting in part and denying in part the appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed. We note, however, that the trial court’s order incorrectly provides that the sentence in 88-15445 runs consecutive to the sentences in 89-20911 and 89-20913. The written plea agreements and sentences attached to the order reflect that all sentences are to run concurrent with each other.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. State, 643 So. 2d 110, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 9618, 1994 WL 543102 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
643 So. 2d 110 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Borders v. State
643 So. 2d 110 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)