Thompson v. State

640 So. 2d 1236, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7917, 1994 WL 416124
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 11, 1994·No. No. 93-3452·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, a juvenile, was convicted of battery and sentenced as an adult. Appellant contends that the trial court did not meet the requirements of section 39.059(7), Fla.Stat. (1993), in imposing adult sanctions because the trial court did not address all of the statutory criteria and the trial court did not enter a written order containing findings of fact and the reasons for imposing adult sanctions. We must reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7) and Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993) (trial court must consider each of criteria of section 39.059(7)(c), and must provide written findings and reasons at the time of sentencing).

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

JOANOS, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 640 So. 2d 1236, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 7917, 1994 WL 416124 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

640 So. 2d 1236 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

White v. State
651 So. 2d 1264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)