Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Thompson v. State

Thompson v. State

559 So. 2d 1171, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 96, 1990 WL 1046
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 525 So. 2d 1011 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 10, 1990·No. No. 88-2990·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed in all respects. However, in imposing an upward departure sentence, the court failed [1172]*1172to state the grounds for departure in writing. Accordingly, the sentence is reversed and the cause is remanded for resentenc-ing, stating written grounds if the sentence constitutes a departure from the sentencing guidelines. Stewart v. State, 549 So.2d 171 (Fla.1989).

DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., and McNULTY, JOSEPH P., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 559 So. 2d 1171, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 96, 1990 WL 1046 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

559 So. 2d 1171 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stewart v. State
549 So. 2d 171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)