Thompson v. State
394 So. 2d 1105, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18887
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 375 So. 2d 633 →
Opinion
Upon review of the order entered by the trial court revoking defendant’s probation, we hold that the evidence supported the trial court’s ruling that defendant violated his probation by the commission of a burglary.
The state has conceded, however, that the evidence of defendant’s ability to pay costs of supervision was insufficient. Byrd v. State, 390 So.2d 145 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We therefore order the court’s finding that defendant violated condition 9 be stricken.
Affirmed as modified; remanded with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. State, 394 So. 2d 1105, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18887 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
394 So. 2d 1105 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Byrd v. State
390 So. 2d 145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)