Thompson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Thompson v. State

95 So. 304, 85 Fla. 86

DecidedJanuary 25, 1923

StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 304 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, 95 So. 304, 85 Fla. 86 (Fla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In bastardy proceedings under the statute the judgment contains an item of $60.00 for incidental expenses attending the birth of the child. There is nc evidence to sustain this part of the judgment; therefore the judgment is reversed and the cause will be remanded for a new trial. See Flores v. State, 72 Fla. 302, 73 South. Rep. 234, as to testimony admissible in proceedings of this character.

Reversed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitpield, Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur. [87]*87West, J., specially concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In bastardy proceedings under the statute the judgment contains an item of $60.00 for incidental expenses attending the birth of the child. There is nc evidence to sustain this part of the judgment; therefore the judgment is reversed and the cause will be remanded for a new trial. See Flores v. State, 72 Fla. 302, 73 South. Rep. 234, as to testimony admissible in proceedings of this character.

Reversed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitpield, Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur. [87]*87West, J., specially concurs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 So. 304, 85 Fla. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-fla-1923.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack