Thompson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Thompson v. State

160 So. 925, 26 Ala. App. 695

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 19, 1935

Docket8 Div. 999.

StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 925 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, 160 So. 925, 26 Ala. App. 695 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, Judge.

“The procedure, practice and rules governing the Circuit Courts of- Alabama shall in all things apply to and govern the procedure and practice in the Law and Equity Court of Lauderdale County. * * * ” Loc. Acts Ala. 1931, pp. 72, 75, § 15.

The situation here is exactly (except for the nisi prius court involved) that that existed in Stewart v. State, ante, p. 78, 153 So. 296.

Upon the authority of the holding in that case, the judgment here is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, Judge.

“The procedure, practice and rules governing the Circuit Courts of- Alabama shall in all things apply to and govern the procedure and practice in the Law and Equity Court of Lauderdale County. * * * ” Loc. Acts Ala. 1931, pp. 72, 75, § 15.

The situation here is exactly (except for the nisi prius court involved) that that existed in Stewart v. State, ante, p. 78, 153 So. 296.

Upon the authority of the holding in that case, the judgment here is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 So. 925, 26 Ala. App. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-alactapp-1935.