Thompson v. State
This text of 115 So. 72 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
But two exceptions are reserved for review, and they relate to the oral charge of the court. A defendant may be an accessory to the possession of a still, just' as he may be an accessory to any other crime, and if one is in possession of a still, and is aided and abetted by another, both are equally guilty. The court’s charge was free from error, and, there being no error apparent on the trial, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
The sentence is indefinite, and therefore the cause is remanded to the circuit court for proper sentence. Tuggle v. State, 19 Ala. App. 539, 98 So. 700.
Affirmed, and remanded for sentence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 So. 72, 22 Ala. App. 299, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 9, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-alactapp-1928.