Thompson v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Thompson v. State

104 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 26, 1925

Docket8 Div. 202.

StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 926 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. State, 104 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

It would serve no good purpose to set out in detail the evidence in this case. We have read and considered the testimony, and find the case of the state amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. The affirm *699 ative charge was,properly refused, and the other charges gave undue prominence to certain facts testified to by the defendant’s witnesses. The defendant has had a fair trial, and, no error being apparent on the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

It would serve no good purpose to set out in detail the evidence in this case. We have read and considered the testimony, and find the case of the state amply sufficient to sustain the verdict. The affirm *699 ative charge was,properly refused, and the other charges gave undue prominence to certain facts testified to by the defendant’s witnesses. The defendant has had a fair trial, and, no error being apparent on the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

104 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-alactapp-1925.