Thompson v. State

585 So. 2d 925, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1321, 1991 WL 186840
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 581 So. 2d 1216
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided August 23, 1991·No. CR-90-801·Published

Opinion

TYSON, Judge.

In the Circuit Court of Etowah County, the appellant was convicted of robbery in the first degree and assault in the second degree by a jury. He was sentenced to 40 years’ imprisonment on the robbery conviction and to 10 years’ imprisonment on the assault conviction, with the sentences to run concurrently. The trial court ordered the appellant to pay restitution in the amount of $115, court costs, and $50 to the Victims’ Compensation Fund.

On February 20, 1991, and May 10, 1991, the trial judge entered orders stating that the appellant was indigent and without funds to pay for a transcript or for counsel for his appeal. The trial court appointed the Honorable Walden H. Buttram to represent the appellant on appeal. On May 28, 1991, Mr. Buttram filed a motion asking this court to allow him to withdraw from this case because the appellant’s father had retained other counsel to represent the appellant on appeal. This motion was granted on May 30, 1991.

To date, no brief has been filed with this court on behalf of the appellant. The attorney general, citing Burks v. State, 522 So.2d 796 (Ala.Crim.App.1988), has moved to dismiss this appeal for failure to file a brief. In Burks, the appeal was dismissed because Burks had failed to file a brief with this court and because there was no indication in the record that Burks was indigent. Here, however, the trial court found in his orders of February 20 and May 10 that the appellant was indigent and was unable to pay for the costs of an appeal.

Thus, the submission is hereby set aside and the cause is remanded to the circuit court for that court to conduct a hearing to determine if the appellant is, in fact, represented by retained counsel. If the appellant has not retained counsel, the circuit court shall appoint new counsel to represent the appellant and shall direct counsel to file a brief with this court in a timely manner. The circuit court shall make due return to this court within 30 days of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 585 So. 2d 925, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1321, 1991 WL 186840 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).

585 So. 2d 925 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burks v. State
522 So. 2d 796 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1988)