Thompson v. State

27 So. 2d 59, 248 Ala. 270, 1946 Ala. LEXIS 213
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided June 27, 1946·No. 8 Div. 353.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The petitioner seeks to review the holding of the Court of Appeals in two respects. First, for sustaining the trial court in submitting -the case to the jury without a demand being made by the defendant for a trial by jury. Second, in refusing the affirmative charge’’requested by him in writing. The- Court of Appeals states the evidence upon which the trial court acted in these two rulings, and we concur -in the holding* in both respects. Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. Goodwyn, 202 Ala. 599, 81 So. 339; Thompson et al. v. State ex rel. Key, 247 Ala. 585, 25 So.2d 671.

Writ of certiorari. is, therefore, denied.

Writ denied.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. State, 27 So. 2d 59, 248 Ala. 270, 1946 Ala. LEXIS 213 (Ala. 1946).

27 So. 2d 59 (Thompson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

W.L.L. v. State
649 So. 2d 1335 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1994)
Patty v. State
45 So. 2d 333 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1950)