Thompson v. State
This text of 27 So. 2d 59 (Thompson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner seeks to review the holding of the Court of Appeals in two respects. First, for sustaining the trial court in submitting -the case to the jury without a demand being made by the defendant for a trial by jury. Second, in refusing the affirmative charge’’requested by him in writing. The- Court of Appeals states the evidence upon which the trial court acted in these two rulings, and we concur -in the holding* in both respects. Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. Goodwyn, 202 Ala. 599, 81 So. 339; Thompson et al. v. State ex rel. Key, 247 Ala. 585, 25 So.2d 671.
Writ of certiorari. is, therefore, denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 So. 2d 59, 248 Ala. 270, 1946 Ala. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-state-ala-1946.