Thompson v. St. Nicholas Nat. Bank

7 N.Y.S. 491, 61 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 393, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 186, 54 Hun 393, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1130
New York Supreme Court·Decided November 7, 1889·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

It is undoubtedly true that applications for additional allowance can only be made before final costs are adjusted, but it is also true that the court may set aside a taxation of costs upon a proper application, for the purpose of allowing a motion for an extra allowance to be made. This is what was done in the case at bar. The defendant, having been mistaken in his view that he was entitled to tax the allowance which had been previously granted, asked to have the taxation opened in order that he might make a new application for an allowance, which request was granted, and we see no reason to interfere with the discretion thus exercised. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. St. Nicholas Nat. Bank, 7 N.Y.S. 491, 61 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 393, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 186, 54 Hun 393, 1889 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1130 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

7 N.Y.S. 491 (Thompson v. St. Nicholas Nat. Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Utica v. Gold Medal Packing Corp.
55 Misc. 2d 182 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)