Thompson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance
This text of 368 F. App'x 704 (Thompson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal after remand, Rhonda and Keith Thompson challenge the district court’s 1 denial of their motion to award a statutory penalty, attorney fees, and prejudgment interest against their insurer, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company. After careful review, we find no basis for reversal. See All-Ways Logistics, Inc. v. USA Truck, Inc., 583 F.3d 511, 518 (8th Cir.2009) (district court’s denial of prejudgment interest reviewed for abuse of discretion); Dupps v. Travelers Ins. Co., 80 F.3d 312, 313 (8th Cir.1996) (de novo review of district court’s application of state law); Running M Farms, Inc. v. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 371 Ark. 308, 265 S.W.3d 740, 745 (2007); State Farm Mut. Ins. Co. v. Thomas, 316 Ark. 345, 871 S.W.2d 571, 573 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
. The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
368 F. App'x 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-southern-farm-bureau-casualty-insurance-ca8-2010.