Thompson v. Social Security Board

154 F.2d 204, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 27, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2032
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 18, 1946·No. 9099·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued in the District Court to review a decision of the Social Security Board. This appeal is from a summary judgment for the Board.

Appellant had filed with the Board a claim to insurance benefits as the widow of a wage-earner. The Board had found, on conflicting evidence, that appellant was not “living with” the wage-earner at the time of his death and therefore was not entitled to benefits. 53 Stat. 1365, § 202(e) (1), 42 U.S.C.A. § 402(e) (1), 53 Stat. 1378, § 209(n), 42 U.S.C.A. § 409(n). The Board filed in the District Court a certified copy of the record, including the evidence on which the Board’s findings and judgment were based. The proceedings before the court were a review of that record, not a trial de novo. Since the evidence in support of the Board’s findings of fact was substantial, those findings were conclusive. 53 Stat. 1370, § 205(g), 42 U.S. C. A. § 405(g). The District Court was therefore right in entering summary judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Social Security Board, 154 F.2d 204, 81 U.S. App. D.C. 27, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2032 (D.C. Cir. 1946).

154 F.2d 204 (Thompson v. Social Security Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilliam v. Gardner
284 F. Supp. 529 (D. South Carolina, 1968)
Pearson v. Gardner
267 F. Supp. 498 (W.D. Arkansas, 1967)
Ogden v. Celebrezze
211 F. Supp. 558 (D. New Jersey, 1962)
Boles v. Celebrezze
210 F. Supp. 856 (W.D. Virginia, 1962)
Bomer v. Ribicoff
304 F.2d 427 (Sixth Circuit, 1962)
Foster v. Flemming
190 F. Supp. 908 (N.D. Iowa, 1960)
Carqueville v. Folsom
170 F. Supp. 777 (N.D. Illinois, 1958)
Wiener v. Folsom
153 F. Supp. 21 (D. New Jersey, 1957)
Healey v. Folsom
139 F. Supp. 285 (S.D. New York, 1955)
Hobby v. Burke
227 F.2d 932 (Fifth Circuit, 1955)
Mullowney v. Hobby
134 F. Supp. 419 (D. Nebraska, 1955)
Shelden v. Hobby
125 F. Supp. 263 (D. Kansas, 1954)
Vinson v. Hobby
114 F. Supp. 663 (S.D. West Virginia, 1953)