Thompson v. Scott
393 S.E.2d 447, 260 Ga. 164
Opinion
We granted certiorari in this case, Scott v. Thompson, 193 Ga. App. 487 (388 SE2d 371) (1989), to consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court should not have granted defendants a new trial on the principal amount of the notes in dispute, but should have granted a new trial only on capital gains, interest, and attorney fees. Having considered the record and arguments, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. Scott, 393 S.E.2d 447, 260 Ga. 164 (Ga. 1990).
393 S.E.2d 447 (Thompson v. Scott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Allen v. Spiker
689 S.E.2d 326 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Clark
566 S.E.2d 2 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Marret v. Scott
441 S.E.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)
Floyd v. First Union National Bank
417 S.E.2d 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)
Scott v. Thompson
415 S.E.2d 508 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1992)