Thompson v. Saukhla

District Court, E.D. California·Decided February 18, 2020·No. 2:18-cv-02422·Unknown

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3

4 FELICIA THOMPSON Case No. 2:18-cv-2422 WBS-KJN 5

6 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

7 v. Trial Date: November 24, 2020 8 Action Filed: September 3, 2018 NARINDER SAUKHLA, et al., 9

10 Defendants.

11 12 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 13 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 14 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 15 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 16 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 17 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures 18 or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 19 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 20 applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that 21 this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; 22 Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied 23 when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 24 The following Stipulated Protective Order shall govern the use and disclosure of the 25 documents and materials listed herein, and any other documents that are designated “confidential” 26 by the producing party. 27 1 2. DEFINITIONS 2 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 3 information or items under this Order. 4 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 5 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 6 Civil Procedure 26(c) and for which public disclosure is likely to result in particularized harm, or is 7 privileged under law, and/or violates privacy interests. This information may include: 8 a. information regarding Plaintiff’s medical history disclosed in 9 communications between the decedent and Plaintiff; 10 b. intimate details of Plaintiff’s personal relationships with those other than 11 decedent disclosed in communications between the decedent and Plaintiff; 12 c. intimate details of decedent’s personal relationships with those other than 13 Plaintiff disclosed in communications between the decedent and Plaintiff; 14 d. employment records that would otherwise be privileged. 15 Other items may be included as Confidential for purposes of this order by agreement of the 16 parties or by court order on noticed motion. 17 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well 18 as their support staff). 19 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 20 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 21 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 22 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 23 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 24 discovery in this matter. 25 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 26 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 27 consultant in this action. 1 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 3 entity not named as a Party to this action. 4 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action 5 but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on 6 behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 7 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 8 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 9 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 10 Material in this action. 11 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 12 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, 13 storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 14 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 15 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 16 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 17 Producing Party. 18 3. SCOPE 19 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 20 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 21 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 22 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 23 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 24 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 25 Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 26 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 27 through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 1 information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of 2 Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 3 4. DURATION 4 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 5 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 6 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 7 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 8 and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the 9 time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 10 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 11 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or 12 Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to 13 limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The 14 Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or 15 oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, 16 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within 17 the ambit of this Order. 18 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown 19 to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily 20 encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on 21 other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 22 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for 23 protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties 24 that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Saukhla, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Thompson v. Saukhla (Thompson v. Saukhla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.