Thompson v. Sargent
This text of 15 Abb. Pr. 452 (Thompson v. Sargent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the execution against a married woman it is not necessary to its vitality that it should contain the words contended for. The words in the amendment are merely di[454]*454rectory;—of course the sheriff cannot levy on any other property than the separate property, and unless the execution contains a contrary direction there would be no danger that the sheriff would levy on any othei*. I hold, therefore, that the execution is valid. Being valid, I also hold that all provisions of the Code in aid of, or supplementary to the execution, apply to this execution, as well as to any other.
Motion denied without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 Abb. Pr. 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-sargent-nysupct-1862.