Thompson v. Russell

Opinion

—Filed Receiy, □ €d_Enterag Counsel/Parties of Recagy ON APR 1 4 2025 By ewig oe «David Thompson 5824 Alice Ave Teen eto Duty Sun Valley NV 89433 775-357-3531 davidclydethompson@gmail.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA David Thompson Plaintiff pro se_ Case: 3:23-cv-00341-MMD-CSD

Perry Russell □□ al MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF 90 DAYS FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO Defendant. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Comes now plaintiff pro se David Thompson in the above entitled action, a former prisoner held by Nevada Department of Corrections, at Northern Nevada Correctional Center, filing under Hanes v Kerner 92 S Ct 594 (1972), as not trained in law, Rey v USA, 786 F. 3d 1089 (2015), and Norfleet v Walker 684 F. 3d 688 (7th circuit 2012), pro se litigants not to be held to full compliance, files, for an extension of time of 90 days for plaintiff to respond to defendants motion for summary Judgment, to allow plaintiff time to acquire affidavits and other evidence of misrepresentation and perjury perpetrated by defendants in their motion for summary judgment

Respectfully submitted and signed this the 8th of Aprif 2025

DF David C Thompson pro se ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 25, 2025. UNITED STATES MAGISTRA UDGI