Thompson v. Russell

30 Mo. 498
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedJuly 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 30 Mo. 498 (Thompson v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Russell, 30 Mo. 498 (Mo. 1860).

Opinion

Ewing, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The bill of exceptions docs not show that any instructions were given or refused. In a paper attached to the transcript there appear what purport to be and may have been intended as instructions, but there is nothing whatever showing that they are any proper part of the bill of exceptions. If they were, however, no exceptions appear to have been taken at the time to the ruling of the court in giving or refusing them, and they would not therefore be reviewed by this court, although such ruling may have been made the ground for a motion for a new trial. (Power v. Allen, 14 Mo. 367; 27 Mo. 417.) There having been a trial and verdict by a jury, this court will not interfere with the judgment upon the ground that the court below refused a new trial because of the verdict’s being against evidence or against the weight of evidence. (15 Mo. 193.)

Judgment affirmed. The other judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Malin v. Merriam
60 S.W. 1112 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1901)
Ewing v. Reilly
34 Mo. 113 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1863)
Boyse v. Crickard
31 Mo. 530 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1862)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Mo. 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-russell-mo-1860.