Thompson v. Rowe

92 N.Y.S. 1147
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedMarch 21, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 92 N.Y.S. 1147 (Thompson v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Rowe, 92 N.Y.S. 1147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In our opinion the assignment sought to be enforced in this action was within the intention of the statute (chapter 77, p. 156, Laws 1904), and therefore subject to its provisions. People ex rel. Wood v. Lacombe, 99 N. Y. 43, 1 N. E. 599; Spencer v. Myers, 150 N. Y. 269, 44 N. E. 942, 34 L. R. A. 175. 55 Am. St. Rep. 675. The complicated transaction resorted to was evidently a mere subterfuge to escape the statute. To permit it to succeed would defeat the obvious purpose of the Legislature in enacting the statute in question. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People, Ex Rel. Wood v. . Lacombe
1 N.E. 599 (New York Court of Appeals, 1885)
Spencer v. . Myers
44 N.E. 942 (New York Court of Appeals, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 N.Y.S. 1147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-rowe-nyappterm-1905.