Thompson v. Reynolds Auto Co.

121 S.E. 528, 31 Ga. App. 574, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 65
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 8, 1924·No. 14502·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The defendant, having dissolved the garnishment and thereby become a party to the garnishment proceedings, could thereafter, upon the trial of the issue formed in such proceedings and before judgment, except to the affidavit and bond for garnishment. Leake v. Tyner, 112 Ga. 919 (38 S. E. 343).

2. The affidavit, as the basis for the issuance of the summons of garnishment, having been subscribed to before a commercial notary public, who under the law was not authorized to take such affidavits (Civil Code of 1910, § 622), was defective, and the garnishment proceedings were thereby rendered void ab initio; and the court erred in not dismissing the samó upon motion or demurrer duly made by the defendant.

Judgment reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., a/nd Bell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Reynolds Auto Co., 121 S.E. 528, 31 Ga. App. 574, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 65 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

121 S.E. 528 (Thompson v. Reynolds Auto Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jenkins v. COMMUNITY LOAN & INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF SAVANNAH
171 S.E.2d 654 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Whitley v. Jackson
129 S.E. 662 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)