Thompson v. Pearce's Administrator

49 Ala. 210
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided January 15, 1873·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

B. F. SAFFOLD, J.

— The appellee sued the appellant in detinue, to recover “ one chest or box of tools, containing one complete set of carpenter’s tools, embracing all tools used in the carpenter’s trade; one complete set of carving tools, embracing all tools used for scroll work, or carving; two complete sets of drawing tools, used for drawing plans of buildings by architects; also one set of turning tools, used by carpenters in turning-lathes,” &c. The complaint was demurred to, for an insufficient description of the property. The demurrer was overruled, and we think properly. The description was sufficient. Some of the articles are only sold by sets, and would not be serviceable without the set. Haynes v. Crutchfield, 7 Ala. 189.

x The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Pearce's Administrator, 49 Ala. 210 (Ala. 1873).

49 Ala. 210 (Thompson v. Pearce's Administrator) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

West Virginia Timber Co. v. Ferrell
67 S.E. 69 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1910)
Nelson v. Howison
122 Ala. 573 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Harris v. Russell
93 Ala. 59 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1890)
Montgomery & Eufaula Railway Co. v. Culver
75 Ala. 587 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)