Thompson v. Parham

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 17, 2009
• Docket: 07-2095
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2095

MOE THOMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WALTER H. PARHAM, General Counsel, University of South Carolina; UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:06-cv-02064-CMC)

Submitted: March 27, 2009 Decided: April 17, 2009

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percy Squire, PERCY SQUIRE CO., LLC, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant. Andrew F. Lindemann, William H., Davidson, II, DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Moe Thompson appeals from the district court’s order

granting summary judgment against him in his civil action

alleging a violation of the Rehabilitation Act. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court from the

bench on October 5, 2007, as noted in the court’s summary

judgment order filed on October 10, 2007. See Thompson v.

Parham, No. 3:06-cv-02064-CMC (D.S.C. Oct. 10, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED