Thompson v. Orser

30 S.E. 626, 105 Ga. 482, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 581
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 13, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 S.E. 626 (Thompson v. Orser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Orser, 30 S.E. 626, 105 Ga. 482, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 581 (Ga. 1898).

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. As a general rule a court of equity will not interfere with: the administration of estates -by placing the assets thereof in the-hands of a receiver. It will, however, at the instance of heirs or the sureties upon the administrator’s bond, where there is danger of loss or other injury to their interests, afford- such extraordinary relief as may be necessary to prevent the same.

2. Under the facts disclosed by the present record, it does not appear that there was any'abuse of discretion in granting the injunction, prayed for, or in appointing a receiver.

Judgment affirmed.

All concurring, except Cobb, J., absent. Injunction and receiver. Before Judge Sweat. Charlton; county. January 20, 1898. Arthur E. Cochran and Leon A. Wilson, for plaintiff in error. Toomer & Reynolds and W. M. OUiff, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lefkoff v. Sicro
6 S.E.2d 687 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Butler v. Floyd
191 S.E. 460 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 S.E. 626, 105 Ga. 482, 1898 Ga. LEXIS 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-orser-ga-1898.