Thompson v. Newhouse

Indiana Court of Appeals

Thompson v. Newhouse

211 N.E.2d 512, 138 Ind. App. 48, 1965 Ind. App. LEXIS 498

CourtIndiana Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 15, 1965

DocketNo. 20,446

StatusPublished

This text of 211 N.E.2d 512 (Thompson v. Newhouse) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Newhouse, 211 N.E.2d 512, 138 Ind. App. 48, 1965 Ind. App. LEXIS 498 (Ind. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

On Motion to Dismiss

Bierly, C. J.

On November 5, 1965, appellant, by William S. Hall, attorney, of the firm of Dowden, Denny, Caughran & Lowe, filed a verified motion entitled “APPELLANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL,” alleging therein that this court extended the time to file transcript and assignment of errors to and including November 8, 1965; that appellant does not desire to perfect his appeal; that information has been furnished by the attorney for the appellee that no cross assignment of errors has been or will be filed.

[49]*49Appellee, by his attorney, John C. Ruckelshaus, filed an acknowledgment of service of “Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal” and, also, waived any objections thereto;

And the court, having examined said motion and proof of service and waiver by appellee, and being duly advised in the premises, finds that said motion should be sustained;

And the court now dismisses said cause of action, with costs to be taxed against the appellant.

Cause of action dismissed; costs taxed against appellant.

Note. — Reported in 211 N. E. 2d 512.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI