Thompson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
This text of 91 F. App'x 604 (Thompson v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Keith J. Thompson appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his [605]*605action brought under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 153 First (q), seeking judicial review of an arbitrator’s decision upholding his firing by the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”).
Thompson contends his amended complaint naming Amtrak as a defendant should relate back to the date of his timely-filed original complaint. But Thompson did not establish that Amtrak had notice of his action within 120 days of the filing of the original complaint, or that Amtrak knew or should have known that Thompson had mistakenly failed to name Amtrak as a defendant. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c).
The record does not support Thompson’s contention that Amtrak and the National Mediation Board are “so closely related in their business operations or other activities that the institution of an action against one serves to provide notice of the litigation to the other.” G.F. Co. v. Pan Ocean Shipping Co., 23 F.3d 1498, 1503 (9th Cir.1994) (internal quotation omitted).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 F. App'x 604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-national-railroad-passenger-corp-ca9-2004.