Thompson v. Morris

1 N.C. 102
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Thompson v. Morris. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 N.C. 248
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 15, 1813·Published

Opinion

Henderson, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court:

It is clear from the authorities that the present action affirms the sale; therefore it cannot be sustained before the term of credit expires. An action for the breach of contract, in not giving the bond, or for not returning the mare, would have been the proper remedy. The principles which govern this case are well established and clearly laid down in 4 East 147, and 3 Bos. and Pul. 582. As, therefore, this action was commenced before the cause of action accrued, the non suit must stand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Morris, 1 N.C. 102 (N.C. 1813).

1 N.C. 102 (Thompson v. Morris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.