Thompson v. Marsh Cypress Co.
This text of 73 S.E. 352 (Thompson v. Marsh Cypress Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence for the plaintiff did not prove the allegations of negligence as laid in the petition. Admitting all the facts proved and all reasonable deductions therefrom, the negligence alleged against the master as the basis of liability not only was not shown, but it affirmatively appeared that the injury was caused by the negligence of a fellow servant and the concurring' negligence of the plaintiff himself. The nonsuit was properly awarded. Civil Code (1910), § 5942. Judgment on main bill of exceptions affirmed; eross-bill dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 S.E. 352, 10 Ga. App. 303, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-marsh-cypress-co-gactapp-1912.