Thompson v. Maddux

105 Ala. 326
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 15, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 105 Ala. 326 (Thompson v. Maddux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. Maddux, 105 Ala. 326 (Ala. 1894).

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

Our opinion is that there has been no such final decree rendered in this cause, as will support an appeal. The word “considered,” used in connection with other proper words, may be sufficient to give the entry the force and effect of a formal decree— as that it is considered by the court, that the plaintiff recover, or have relief as prayed for, &c. But where the only entry is, “Upon consideration, it is the opinion [328]*328of the court that complainant is entitled to make a defense,” not followed by words- decreeing relief, or that the party is entitled to relief, or words of equivalent import, it can not be said, under such an order, that anything has been decreed or determined by the court, except that it orders a reference. This court has jurisdiction of appeals from final decrees, but not from a mere opinion that a party is entitled to make a defense. The appeal is really prosecuted from an order of reference to the register.

The appeal must be dismissed for want of jurisdiction in this court.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaines v. Milner
97 So. 2d 584 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Marsh v. Wayland
96 So. 2d 805 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Moore v. Shipp
81 So. 2d 352 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Shell Oil Company v. Edwards
81 So. 2d 535 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Lyall v. Lyall
35 So. 2d 550 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Cooper v. Owen
161 So. 98 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1935)
Hill v. Hill
100 So. 340 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Grand Bay Land Co. v. Simpson
92 So. 789 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Threadgill v. Dixie Industrial Co.
80 So. 391 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1918)
Ex parte Gist
119 Ala. 463 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Hunt v. Stockton Lumber Co.
113 Ala. 387 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)
Vice v. Littlejohn
109 Ala. 294 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Richardson v. Peagler
111 Ala. 478 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)
Randall v. Hardy
107 Ala. 476 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 Ala. 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-maddux-ala-1894.