Thompson v. M R & R Trucking Co.

226 So. 2d 340
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 10, 1969
DocketNo. 38690
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 So. 2d 340 (Thompson v. M R & R Trucking Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Thompson v. M R & R Trucking Co., 226 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 2, 1969.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for allowance of an attorney’s fee is also denied.

ERVIN, C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, CARLTON and BOYD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mendez v. Blackburn
226 So. 2d 340 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 So. 2d 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-m-r-r-trucking-co-fla-1969.