Thompson v. Lockert
239 S.E.2d 264, 293 N.C. 593, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1008
This text of 239 S.E.2d 264 (Thompson v. Lockert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thompson v. Lockert, 239 S.E.2d 264, 293 N.C. 593, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1008 (N.C. 1977).
Opinion
Thelma R. THOMPSON
v.
Dr. Charles R. LOCKERT.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Golding, Crews, Meekins, Gordan & Gray, for defendant.
Rutledge & Pruett, Williams, Willeford, Boger & Grady, for plaintiff.
Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 34 N.C.App. 1, 237 S.E.2d 259. Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lee v. Regan
267 S.E.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
239 S.E.2d 264, 293 N.C. 593, 1977 N.C. LEXIS 1008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-lockert-nc-1977.