Thompson v. Lamb

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Thompson v. Lamb

22 N.W. 443, 33 Minn. 196, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 42

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided February 11, 1885·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the determination of the issues by the court, upon trial without a jury. No questions are presented for review except such as relate to the correctness of the findings of fact made by the court. But there is no case or bill of exceptions showing upon what evidence the findings were based, and therefore it must be presumed that they are in accordance with the proof. A transcript of the court reporter’s notes [197]*197of evidence, merely certified by him, does not constitute a record of the case. There is nothing for us to consider, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered upon the determination of the issues by the court, upon trial without a jury. No questions are presented for review except such as relate to the correctness of the findings of fact made by the court. But there is no case or bill of exceptions showing upon what evidence the findings were based, and therefore it must be presumed that they are in accordance with the proof. A transcript of the court reporter’s notes [197]*197of evidence, merely certified by him, does not constitute a record of the case. There is nothing for us to consider, and the judgment is affirmed.

Thompson v. Lamb, 22 N.W. 443, 33 Minn. 196, 1885 Minn. LEXIS 42 (Mich. 1885).

Pincite

22 N.W. 443 (Thompson v. Lamb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related