Thompson v. Lakewood City Development Co.
188 A.D. 996
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 15, 1919·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, 30sts. No opinion. Mills, Rich and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. .Jayeox, J., voted for reversal upon the ground that under the statu\e State of New Jersey,
Decisions by the Presiding Justice upon Applications to'l from the Appellate Term.
See N. J. Laws of 1880, p. 255, chap. 170, § 2, as amd. byj. Laws of 1881, p. 184, chap. 147; 3 Comp. Stat. N. J. 3421, § 48; Thompson v. Lakewood City Development Co. (105 Misc. Rep. 680, 681).— [Re:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. Lakewood City Development Co., 188 A.D. 996 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1919).
188 A.D. 996 (Thompson v. Lakewood City Development Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Capri Jewelry, Inc. v. Uri Chayavi
117 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
McGough v. Derby
254 A.D. 708 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
Jones v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
158 Misc. 466 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Bernstein v. Fuerth
132 Misc. 343 (New York City Court, 1928)