Thompson v. Kovens

455 So. 2d 1160, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15161
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 1984·No. No. 83-1785·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Since the appellant’s positions on appeal are directly contrary both to the one to which she stipulated and agreed in the trial court, Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania Bank, 252 So.2d 1 (Fla.1971); Lotspeich Company v. Neogard Corporation, 416 So.2d 1163, 1165 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), and the law of the case as established in its prior appearance here, Certain v. Kovens, 314 So.2d 184 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976), the judgment under review is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Kovens, 455 So. 2d 1160, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15161 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

455 So. 2d 1160 (Thompson v. Kovens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lotspeich Co. v. Neogard Corp.
416 So. 2d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Gunn Plumbing, Inc. v. Dania Bank
252 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Certain v. Kovens
314 So. 2d 184 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)