Thompson v. King

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Thompson v. King

23 F. Cas. 1056, 5 Cranch 93

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1836·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CRANCH, Chief Judge,

was of opinion that Thompson could not now come in as a general creditor of King’s estate for the balance.

MORSELL, Circuit Judge, contra.

■THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, being absent, -the case was continued to the next term, when upon further argument by the same counsel, ■

THE COURT (CRANCH, Chief Judge, contra), stopped R. S. Coxe in reply, and decided that Thompson could come in as a general creditor, upon the assets of George King’s estate, for the difference between the amount of sales of the house and lot, and. the amount -of the value of Thompson’s improvements as found by the auditor.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRANCH, Chief Judge,

was of opinion that Thompson could not now come in as a general creditor of King’s estate for the balance.

MORSELL, Circuit Judge, contra.

■THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, being absent, -the case was continued to the next term, when upon further argument by the same counsel, ■

THE COURT (CRANCH, Chief Judge, contra), stopped R. S. Coxe in reply, and decided that Thompson could come in as a general creditor, upon the assets of George King’s estate, for the difference between the amount of sales of the house and lot, and. the amount -of the value of Thompson’s improvements as found by the auditor.

Thompson v. King, 23 F. Cas. 1056, 5 Cranch 93 (circtddc 1836).

Pincite

23 F. Cas. 1056 (Thompson v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related