Thompson v. Johnston

94 F.2d 355, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4417
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 11, 1938·No. No. 8714·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court (Northern District of California) denied the issuance of the writ of habeas corpus upon appellant’s petition, hence this appeal by him.

Petitioner is restrained of his liberties by virtue of conviction and sentence upon three indictment charges. His only point is that he was convicted and sentenced to prison, where he is now restrained of his liberties, upon a conspiracy charge, which is not of itself a crime since the scheme to violate a federal law was actually accomplished and petitioner was convicted and sentenced to prison upon the substantive offense.

We need but quote one sentence from Parmagini v. United States, 1930, 9 Cir., 42 F.2d 721, 725 : “The last count of conspiracy to violate these laws is a separate and distinct offense punishable as such. Ader v. U. S. (C.C.A.) 284 F. 13; Brady v. U. S. (C.C.A.) 24 F.2d 405, 59 A.L.R. 563.” 18 U.S.C.A. § 88.

The ruling of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Johnston, 94 F.2d 355, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 4417 (9th Cir. 1938).

94 F.2d 355 (Thompson v. Johnston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rouse v. State
97 A.2d 285 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1953)
Ex parte Jones
100 F. Supp. 598 (W.D. Washington, 1951)
Harrison v. King
111 F.2d 420 (Eighth Circuit, 1940)