Thompson v. Johnson

202 N.C. 817
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided June 15, 1932·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Pee Oubiam:.

It is true that tbe complaint is little more than a skeleton, but tbe judgment overruling tbe demurrer is • sustained upon tbe authority of Deloatch v. Vinson, 108 N. C., 148, 12 S. E., 895. Tbe Court said: “Tbe payee or endorser of a note is tbe prima facie owner and bolder. Tbe allegation that be is so is unnecessary, and if tbe defendant defends upon tbe ground that tbe plaintiff is not such owner, be should set up tbe facts showing title in someone else.”

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Thompson v. Johnson, 202 N.C. 817 (N.C. 1932).

202 N.C. 817 (Thompson v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liles v. Myers
248 S.E.2d 385 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1978)
Parkinson v. Diefenderfer
280 P.2d 424 (Montana Supreme Court, 1955)
Albergo v. Gigliotti
85 P.2d 107 (Utah Supreme Court, 1938)
Sossamon v. Oaklawn Cemetery, Inc.
193 S.E. 720 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)
Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Cohen
1 N.E.2d 717 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1936)
Atlantic Life Insurance v. Dey
174 S.E. 89 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1934)