Thompson v. Johnberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Thompson v. Johnberg

152 Minn. 538

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedApril 13, 1922

DocketNo. 22,948

StatusPublished

This text of 152 Minn. 538 (Thompson v. Johnberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Thompson v. Johnberg, 152 Minn. 538 (Mich. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appeal' in this action is from an order dismissing an appeal from the municipal court of the city of Crookston. The order appealed from orders that “judgment be entered accordingly.” The practice in such cases is the same as in appeals from justice to district courts. Laws 1895, p. 589, c. 229, § 38; G. S. 1913, § 280; Santala v. Hill, 143 Minn. 289, 173 N. W. 651. An order dismissing such an appeal is not appealable. Appeal lies only from the judgment entered in district court. Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 470, 69 N. W. 215. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal' in this action is from an order dismissing an appeal from the municipal court of the city of Crookston. The order appealed from orders that “judgment be entered accordingly.” The practice in such cases is the same as in appeals from justice to district courts. Laws 1895, p. 589, c. 229, § 38; G. S. 1913, § 280; Santala v. Hill, 143 Minn. 289, 173 N. W. 651. An order dismissing such an appeal is not appealable. Appeal lies only from the judgment entered in district court. Graham v. Conrad, 66 Minn. 470, 69 N. W. 215. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 Minn. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-johnberg-minn-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack