Thompson v. Jennings
75 F. 572, 21 C.C.A. 486, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2933
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 28, 1895
DocketNo. 116
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 75 F. 572 (Thompson v. Jennings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Thompson v. Jennings, 75 F. 572, 21 C.C.A. 486, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2933 (2d Cir. 1895).
Opinion
Unless the patent in suit can he limited so as to cover only a hand saw or a hack saw, there appears to be no escape from the conclusions expressed in the opinion of Judge LACOMBE in the court below. It cannot be thus limited, in view of its unequivocal language. We deem it unnecessary to add anything to the opinion of Judge LACOMBE. The decree is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Thompson v. N. T. Bushnell Co.
96 F. 238 (Second Circuit, 1899)
Thompson v. N. T. Bushnell Co.
88 F. 81 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1898)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
75 F. 572, 21 C.C.A. 486, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-jennings-ca2-1895.