Thompson v. Jennings
75 F. 572, 21 C.C.A. 486, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2933
Opinion
Unless the patent in suit can he limited so as to cover only a hand saw or a hack saw, there appears to be no escape from the conclusions expressed in the opinion of Judge LACOMBE in the court below. It cannot be thus limited, in view of its unequivocal language. We deem it unnecessary to add anything to the opinion of Judge LACOMBE. The decree is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Thompson v. Jennings, 75 F. 572, 21 C.C.A. 486, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2933 (2d Cir. 1895).
75 F. 572 (Thompson v. Jennings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thompson v. N. T. Bushnell Co.
96 F. 238 (Second Circuit, 1899)
Thompson v. N. T. Bushnell Co.
88 F. 81 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut, 1898)