Thompson v. Jackson, ex. dem. Thompson
This text of 1 Wend. 76 (Thompson v. Jackson, ex. dem. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court,
The excuse offered, and the
fact that the defendants and their witnesses had not departed court, would have authorized the vacatur of the rule of ne recipiatur. The defendant was entitled to the rule when he obtained it; but having elected to retain it, and refusing to permit the plaintiff to try his cause, he is not entitled to the effect of his motion. It is therefore denied, the costs to abide the event of the suit.
intimated that hereafter, should a like case arise, the court would impose costs upon the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Wend. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/thompson-v-jackson-ex-dem-thompson-nysupct-1828.